Sürdürülebilir kalkınma bağlamında teknolojik ilerlemenin değerlendirilmesi: Toplum 5.0
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2024
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Bilgi ve iletişim çağının getirdiği inovatif yaklaşımlar her geçen gün daha da yaygın hale gelmektedir. Ülkelerin endüstriyel süreçlerini, sürdürülebilir teknolojik alt yapı ile devam ettirmeleri hem sektörlere hem de toplumsal refaha katkı sağlamaktadır. Üretim teknolojilerinde gerçekleşen Endüstri 4.0’ın çıktılarından yararlanan Toplum 5.0’da toplumsal refaha, sosyal sorumluluğa ve tüm alanlardaki sürdürülebilir iyileştirmelere odaklanmaktadır. Sanayi devrimi ile başlayan ve Toplum 5.0 ile devam eden dönüşüm süreçleri ve teknolojik ilerlemeler; sürdürülebilir ekonomik koşullar, toplumların sosyal yaşamları ve refahları, hükümetler ve politika yapıcılar için önem arz etmektedir. Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı tarafından yürütülen ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma amaçları kapsamında ele alınan teknolojik ilerlemeler, küresel çapta yeni istihdam alanları, enerji verimliliğini artırma gibi ekonomik ve çevresel sorunlara kalıcı çözümler bulabilmek için önemli bir yol olarak görülmektedir. Bu kapsamda çalışmanın amacı, BM sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedeflerinden biri olan teknolojik ilerleme bağlamında ülkelerin Toplum 5.0’a ulaşma düzeylerini tespit etmektir. Bu amaçla ülkelerin Toplum 5.0 bağlamında hangi ülkelerle benzer özellikler gösterdiği ve gruplandığı araştırılmaktadır. Çalışmada 19 ülke için 2021 yılı verileri kullanılarak hiyerarşik ve hiyerarşik olmayan kümeleme analizi yapılarak iki yöntem sonuçları karşılaştırılmıştır. Hiyerarşik kümeleme analizi sonucunda 19 ülke dört kümede sınıflanırken hiyerarşik olmayan kümeleme analizi sonucunda ülkeler 2 kümede sınıflanmaktadır. Hiyerarşik kümeleme analizinin daha tutarlı sonuçlar verdiği düşünülmektedir. Buna sonuçlara göre Rusya ve Türkiye bir kümede gruplanırken, Çin tek başına bir kümede, Hindistan tek başına bir kümede yer almaktadır. Analize dâhil edilen diğer 15 ülke ise bir kümede gruplanmaktadır.
Although academic interest in intangible cultural heritage (ICH) has increased recently, studies in this field have been fragmented. This indicates that there are important gaps in our understanding of the field. Therefore, 351 results including 98 postgraduate theses and 253 academic articles from YÖK Thesis Center, YÖK Academic, DergiPark, Google Scholar, Ideal Online, and SOBİAD retrieved between 15-20 April 2024. In this context, the performance of the field, the most important research topics, the course of development, research structures, and the most productive authors and institutions were analysed. The findings show that academic interest in ICH has increased after 2015 and qualitative studies have come to the fore. In addition, the subject of ICH has been discussed more in the field of folklore, the most productive researchers are M. Öcal Oğuz and Bilgehan Gülcan, and the institutions are Ankara Hacı Bayramı Veli University and Gazi University. The topics most associated with ICH have been UNESCO, cultural heritage, culture, and tourism. The current study contributes to the national literature because it is among the limited studies that consider the relationship of SOKÜM with tourism and, also helps stakeholders by demonstrating to them the field of ICH that needs to be worked on and developed.Innovative approaches brought by the information and communication age are becoming more common day by day. The fact that countries continue their industrial processes with a sustainable technological infrastructure contributes to both sectors and social welfare. Benefiting from the outputs of Industry 4.0 realized in production technologies, and Society 5.0 focuses on social welfare, social responsibility, and sustainable improvements in all areas. The transformation processes and technological advances, which started with the Industrial Revolution and continued with Society 5.0, are important for sustainable economic conditions, social lives, and welfare of societies, governments, and policymakers. Technological advances, carried out by the United Nations Development Program and considered within the scope of sustainable development goals, are seen as an important way to find permanent solutions to economic and environmental problems, such as new employment areas and increasing energy efficiency on a global scale. In this context, the study aims to determine the level of countries' achievement of Society 5.0 in the context of technological progress, which is one of the UN sustainable development goals. For this purpose, which countries have similar characteristics and are investigated and grouped with them in the context of Society 5.0. In the study, hierarchical and non-hierarchical clustering analysis was performed using 2021 data for 19 countries and the results of the two methods were compared. As a result of hierarchical clustering analysis, 19 countries are classified into four clusters, while due to non-hierarchical clustering analysis, countries are classified into two clusters. Hierarchical cluster analysis is thought to provide more consistent results. According to the results, Russia and Turkey are grouped in one cluster, while China is grouped in a single cluster and India in a single cluster. The other 15 countries included in the analysis are grouped in a cluster.
Although academic interest in intangible cultural heritage (ICH) has increased recently, studies in this field have been fragmented. This indicates that there are important gaps in our understanding of the field. Therefore, 351 results including 98 postgraduate theses and 253 academic articles from YÖK Thesis Center, YÖK Academic, DergiPark, Google Scholar, Ideal Online, and SOBİAD retrieved between 15-20 April 2024. In this context, the performance of the field, the most important research topics, the course of development, research structures, and the most productive authors and institutions were analysed. The findings show that academic interest in ICH has increased after 2015 and qualitative studies have come to the fore. In addition, the subject of ICH has been discussed more in the field of folklore, the most productive researchers are M. Öcal Oğuz and Bilgehan Gülcan, and the institutions are Ankara Hacı Bayramı Veli University and Gazi University. The topics most associated with ICH have been UNESCO, cultural heritage, culture, and tourism. The current study contributes to the national literature because it is among the limited studies that consider the relationship of SOKÜM with tourism and, also helps stakeholders by demonstrating to them the field of ICH that needs to be worked on and developed.Innovative approaches brought by the information and communication age are becoming more common day by day. The fact that countries continue their industrial processes with a sustainable technological infrastructure contributes to both sectors and social welfare. Benefiting from the outputs of Industry 4.0 realized in production technologies, and Society 5.0 focuses on social welfare, social responsibility, and sustainable improvements in all areas. The transformation processes and technological advances, which started with the Industrial Revolution and continued with Society 5.0, are important for sustainable economic conditions, social lives, and welfare of societies, governments, and policymakers. Technological advances, carried out by the United Nations Development Program and considered within the scope of sustainable development goals, are seen as an important way to find permanent solutions to economic and environmental problems, such as new employment areas and increasing energy efficiency on a global scale. In this context, the study aims to determine the level of countries' achievement of Society 5.0 in the context of technological progress, which is one of the UN sustainable development goals. For this purpose, which countries have similar characteristics and are investigated and grouped with them in the context of Society 5.0. In the study, hierarchical and non-hierarchical clustering analysis was performed using 2021 data for 19 countries and the results of the two methods were compared. As a result of hierarchical clustering analysis, 19 countries are classified into four clusters, while due to non-hierarchical clustering analysis, countries are classified into two clusters. Hierarchical cluster analysis is thought to provide more consistent results. According to the results, Russia and Turkey are grouped in one cluster, while China is grouped in a single cluster and India in a single cluster. The other 15 countries included in the analysis are grouped in a cluster.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Toplum 5.0, Endüstri 4.0, Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma, Teknolojik İlerleme, Society 5.0, Industry 4.0, Sustainable Development, Technological Advancements
Kaynak
Fiscaoeconomia
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
8
Sayı
1
