Prioritizing of industrial wastewater management processes using an integrated AHP–CoCoSo model: comparative and sensitivity analyses

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-9609-0439en_US
dc.contributor.authorAdar, Elanur
dc.contributor.authorDelice, Elif Kılıç
dc.contributor.authorAdar, Tuba
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-05T10:21:23Z
dc.date.available2021-08-05T10:21:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentAÇÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractThe increase in individuals’ consumption and needs and the rapid development of technology result in different types of industrial wastewaters. A vast majority of industrial wastewaters are harmful to humans and other animals, as well as the environment. This study aimed to identify the priorities for the industrial wastewater management processes based on multiple contradictory criteria. For this purpose, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) techniques were used. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by changing the criteria weights, and comparative analyses were conducted using the Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis, the Combinative Distance-Based Assessment, and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution. Although the criteria weights were obtained using the AHP, alternative rankings were determined using the CoCoSo. Within the scope of the study, alternatives were determined for industrial wastewater management based on four groups—physical, chemical, biological, and thermal—that were further divided into 3 main and 14 subcriteria. Although the AHP method revealed that the most important criterion was operating costs, the membrane processes, electrochemical oxidation, membrane bioreactor and supercritical water oxidation/gasification were determined to be priorities for the physical, chemical, biological, and thermal alternatives, respectively, which provide high efficiency and comply with environmental impact criteria. As a result, it is suggested that membrane bioreactor is the top ranking alternative, followed by electrochemical oxidation.
dc.identifier.citationAdar, E., Delice, E. K., & Adar, T. (2021). Prioritizing of industrial wastewater management processes using an integrated AHP–CoCoSo model: comparative and sensitivity analyses. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 1-22.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13762-021-03511-y
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11494/3302
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorAdar, Elanur
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbHen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAHPen_US
dc.subjectCoCoSoen_US
dc.subjectComparative analysisen_US
dc.subjectIndustrial wastewater managementen_US
dc.subjectMultiple selectionen_US
dc.subjectSensitivity analysisen_US
dc.titlePrioritizing of industrial wastewater management processes using an integrated AHP–CoCoSo model: comparative and sensitivity analysesen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
elanur_adar.pdf
Boyut:
1.45 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümü Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu