The relationship between erosion and precipitation and the effects of different riparian practices on soil and total-p losses via streambank erosion in Small streams in Iowa, USA

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-3350-2897en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-9358-3326en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9696-1153en_US
dc.contributor.authorTüfekçioğlu, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorZaimes, George N.
dc.contributor.authorKahriman, Aydın
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Richard C.
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-09T11:26:03Z
dc.date.available2024-12-09T11:26:03Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAÇÜ, Orman Fakültesi, Orman Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractStreambank erosion in agricultural landscapes contributes high amounts of sediment and total-P to surface water, resulting in the degradation of stream habitats and reduction in ecological services. Moreover, the implication of future climate change on bank erosion is also a growing concern. Streambank erosion rates from riparian forest buffers (RFo), grass filters (GFi), row-crops (RCr) and pastures, including fenced pastures (FPa), rotationally grazed pastures (RPa), intensive rotationally grazed pastures (IPa), and continuously grazed pastures (CPa), in three landform regions of Iowa, were measured over seven years. Bank erosion pins were measured seasonally (spring, summer and fall) in the first five years (2002–2006) and yearly for two more years (2007–2008). It was found that summer and spring seasons are the important ones since the relationships between erosion and precipitation were significantly “strong” in almost all the riparian practices, and precipitation was found to be the main factor driving streambank erosion. Streambank mean soil losses and soil total-P losses from RFo (23.3 tons km?1 yr?1 and 9.8 kg km?1 yr?1, respectively), GFi (31.1 and 9.9) and FPa (44.0 and 23.7) practices were all significantly lower than the grazing pasture practices, including RPa (142.3 and 58), CPa (255 and 105.1), IPa (234.6 and 122.7) and RCr fields (352.9 and 118.9). Also, RPa had significantly lower total-P loss than CPa, IPa and RCr practices (RFo, GFi, FPa < RPa < CPa, IPa, RCr). RCr practices had the highest streambank soil losses among all other riparian practices (RFo, GFi, FPa < RPa < IPa, CPa < RCr). The study showed that riparian conservation practices (RFo, GFi and FPa) showcased significant benefits in mitigating streambank soil loss and associated soil total-P load to streams. However, their effectiveness is highly sensitive to changing climatic conditions and the extent of spatiotemporal variations.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su16198329
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.issue19en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su16198329
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11494/5150
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofSustainability (Switzerland)
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGrazed Pasture Practicesen_US
dc.subjectPhosphorus Loaden_US
dc.subjectRiparian Land Useen_US
dc.subjectStream Bank Erosionen_US
dc.titleThe relationship between erosion and precipitation and the effects of different riparian practices on soil and total-p losses via streambank erosion in Small streams in Iowa, USAen_US
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
mustafa.tufekcioglu-george.zaimes-aydin.kahriman-richard.schultz.pdf
Boyut:
4.92 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Orman Mühendisliği Bölümü Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu