The role of different rest periods on post-activation performance enhancement in plyometric preload

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorŞener, Rüzgar
dc.contributor.authorBayrakdar, Akan
dc.contributor.authorAtıcı, Müjde
dc.contributor.authorAkgün, Soner
dc.contributor.authorSöyleyici Öcal, Zeynep Senem
dc.contributor.authorKarayiğit, Raci
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Ali Kerim
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-02T13:08:25Z
dc.date.available2025-10-02T13:08:25Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentAÇÜ, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Yüksekokulu, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bölümü
dc.description.abstractBackground: The optimal combination of factors such as rest duration, type of activity, and individual variability for maximizing post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) following plyometric conditioning activity (plyometric CA) remains a subject of debate. To investigate the effects of different rest periods (4, 8, and 12 min) on performance following plyometric CA, this randomized controlled study was conducted. Methods: Twenty physically active men were included in this study (mean ± SD: age 20.74 ± 1.94 years, with a range of 18–24 years, body weight 70.61 ± 3.01 kg, and height 176 ± 1.8 cm). Participants familiarized themselves with the plyometric CA protocol through a preliminary session involving three sets of ten tuck jumps to ensure proper technique. A familiarization test was performed on the first day. They performed in a vertical jump test with different rest periods (4, 8, 12 min) between tests, set at 48-hour intervals and the randomized design was compared to the control group. The data obtained were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests in SPSS 25 and Microsoft Office Excel. Results: Although no statistically significant differences were observed between conditions (p > 0.05), a consistent increasing trend in performance indicators was noted following 4-, 8-, and 12-minute rest intervals. Compared to the control condition, jump height increased by 2.81%, 2.95%, and 3.01%; peak power output (PPO) increased by 1.84%, 1.94%, and 2.59%; and PPO relative to total body mass increased by 2.04%, 2.06%, and 2.15%, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, the findings highlight the complexity of rest interval effects on PAPE and suggest the necessity of individualized rest strategies to optimize athletic performance.
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13102-025-01310-3
dc.identifier.issn20521847
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105014727460
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11494/5967
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001565077800002
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.institutionauthorAkgün, Soner
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectPlyometric
dc.subjectPost-activation performance enhancement (PAPE)
dc.subjectResting
dc.subjectVertical jump
dc.titleThe role of different rest periods on post-activation performance enhancement in plyometric preload
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
5967.pdf
Boyut:
1.66 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bölümü Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu