Letter to the editor: "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the satisfaction module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey"
| dc.authorid | 0000-0002-2510-5410 | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Yıldız Kızkın, Zeynep | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-13T10:34:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-13T10:34:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.department | AÇÜ, Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu, İş ve Uğraşı Terapisi Bölümü | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Dear editor, I read with great interest the recent article by Demirdel et al titled “Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the satisfaction module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey.”1 The study aimed to demonstrate the cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the satisfaction module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS) for lower limb orthotics and prosthetics users. The authors concluded that the Turkish version of the scale is psychometrically appropriate. Although the publication makes a significant contribution to the literature, it would be beneficial to address some methodological issues. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000413 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000413 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11494/5216 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wolters Kluwer | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Diğer | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | en_US |
| dc.title | Letter to the editor: "Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the satisfaction module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey" | en_US |
| dc.type | Other |
